A boutique Central London firm acting in corporate and private immigration, public law, human rights, complex litigation and family matters.
Our ExpertiseThe Court of Appeal considered the costs consequences of judicial review proceedings issued after the Home Office failed to meet stated reconsideration deadlines. Nisar succeeded on the basis that the proceedings achieved the relief sought and the Home Office was ordered to pay the relevant costs.
Read judgmentThe Court of Appeal considered the approach to alleged dishonesty under paragraph 322(5), including the use and effect of a minded-to-refuse process. The case raised important procedural fairness issues concerning allegations derived from tax or earnings discrepancies.
Read judgmentThe High Court considered the fairness of the Border Force interviewing process in an entry case. The judgment addressed when an interview becomes procedurally unfair and the obligation to probe and investigate material matters before refusing entry.
Read judgmentThe Court of Appeal held that it was arguable that procedural fairness required an applicant to be given an opportunity to respond before an entry clearance decision was based on suspected dishonesty. The appeal was allowed and permission for judicial review was granted on procedural fairness and irrationality grounds.
Read judgmentRead our independently published client feedback on Trustpilot.
Advising businesses on sponsor licences, compliance and complex Home Office matters.
Find out moreChallenging unlawful decisions and failures by public authorities.
Find out moreActing in high-stakes litigation, disputes and urgent proceedings.
Find out moreSpecialist advice on family issues, children, financial matters and separation.
Find out moreAdvice on personal immigration applications, refusals, administrative reviews and appeals.
Find out more
Choose a time shown in London time. We will email a link to verify your address before the booking is confirmed.